Editorial standards

What we publish

• Explainers and guides on the 10 Directives, safety standards and how to choose AI products and robots.
• News about AI and robot safety: new rules, research, product recalls and incidents.
• Analysis of what those events mean, and which Directive they touch.
• Humasure updates about our own work, clearly labeled as such.

How we use AI, and where a person decides

Our newsroom uses AI to scan sources, draft stories and check them against our style and these standards. Then:

• Every story that names a real company, product or person, and every news or analysis piece, is checked and approved by a person before it is published.
• Explainers and guides that name no company may be published after automated checks, and a person reviews them afterwards.
• Each story says at the end how it was made.

Facts and sources

• Every factual claim links to its source, preferably the original: the study, the regulator, the court filing, the company’s own statement.
• We write in our own words and quote sparingly, with credit.
• We say what we don’t know, and we don’t speculate about causes before they are established.

Fairness

• We describe incidents factually and calmly, without blame beyond what the evidence shows.
• When we report a problem with a company’s product, we link to its response or note that we asked for one.
• We are for safe AI and robots, not against the industry.

Independence

• No company pays for coverage, and we publish no sponsored stories.
• Once Humasure certifies products, coverage of a certified product will say so, and certified producers get no gentler treatment.

Corrections

If we get something wrong, we fix it and add a note at the end of the story saying what changed and when. Report an error to info@humasure.org.